|
Dental evidence of repeat
injury to a common dolphin from fishing gear
1. Introduction
Marine mammal strandings
have shown a marked increase in the Southwest of the UK over the last decade.
The Cornwall Wildlife Trust Strandings Network received over 72 reports of
stranded cetaceans in Cornwall alone over the first three months of 2006. The
carcass of a female common dolphin from a recent stranding at Seaton in the
Southwest of the UK showed evidence of entanglement in fishing gear on at least
one occasion previous to the animals’ death (Figures 1 and 2). Along with
recent cut marks on the beak and fins, scarring was found on the fins, beak and
head which were consistent with a previous entanglement. Due to the length of
time between the death of the animal and it stranding (at least 10 days),
differentiating old injuries from new was not instantly straightforward due to
the effects of decay and scavengers etc.
 
Figure 1.a
Healed injury on inside of beak showing teeth repositioned in gum and
deformation of beak tip 1.b
Deformation of the beak and lower jaw (anterior dorsal view)
(Link
to stranding report for the Seaton dolphin)
However, a dental
examination of the carcass showed that the fractured teeth were either sharp and
jagged (recent injury), or worn smooth (old injury), giving concise evidence of
repeat capture. Net entanglement has serious implications in issues such as
animal welfare, as it implies that wild cetaceans are not only sustaining and
surviving serious injuries, they may also be repeatedly feeding from fishing
gear. The bite mark or closed contact point between the remaining beak and
lower jaw shows that this animal has been living with this injury for a
considerable length of time, a finding confirmed by the dental examination.
2. Materials and
methods
Brief examination of
the carcass
Age of carcass -
approximately 10 days post-mortem
Condition cut marks from a
recent injury and over 15 cm of the beak was absent, though the injury had
healed. Injury sustained to the skin covering the beak and lower jaw. Healed
injury on inside of beak showing teeth repositioned in gum and deformation of
beak tip; scarring consistent with previous net entanglement was also found on
the flipper, along with an injury on the head below the left eye. This animal
had obviously suffered serious trauma in the past (possibly from net
entanglement) from which it survived until it was caught again, this time with
fatal consequences. The lower jaw was removed from the carcass and examples of
teeth showing recent and old injuries were extracted and cleaned with ethanol
and a fine brush, then left to dry naturally. The teeth were mounted
on a specimen stub using a carbon tab, and coated with c. 8 nm of gold in an
Emitech K 550 sputter coater (working at approximately 5 x 10-6 Torr). The
processed specimens were investigated and photographed using a JEOL JSM 5600
scanning electron microscope operated at 15 kv, and a 15 mm working distance.
3. Results
The position of the broken
teeth in Figure 2 shows that most of the damage was caused to the middle teeth
in the right lower jaw and the middle teeth in the left upper jaw, a finding
consistent with the animal twisting to the left whilst pulling back from a
tangle net or other ensnaring fishing device.
Figure 2.
Position of the severely broken teeth (most of the teeth showed some evidence of
old damage).
Figure 3.a presents a SEM
image of tooth number 149 side view (jagged edge indicates a recent injury),
whilst Figure 3.b presents a top view of the tooth (rough surface also indicates
a recent injury).

Figure 3.a
Tooth number 149 side view (jagged edge indicates a recent injury). 3.b
Top view (rough surface also indicates a recent injury)
Figure 4.
Tooth number 160 (rough surface indicating a recent injury)

Figure 5.
Tooth number 166. The damaged area has been worn smooth indicating an old
injury

Figure 6.
Tooth number 172 presenting with a vertical fracture and missing section though
the damaged area has been worn smooth (similar damage continued to Tooth number
181)
4. Discussion
Evidence of repeated
entanglement has serious implications in issues of animal welfare, as it implies
that wild animals are not only sustaining serious injuries caused by net
entanglement, they may also be repeatedly feeding from fishing gear, indicating
the possible need for restrictions in the use of tangle and gill nets during
certain times of the year. In addition, disabilities that may reduce the
dolphins’ ability to catch food (e.g. an old injury or deafness) may give the
animals little choice other than to feed from easy sources such as a static
tangle net. Figure 7 is a Tooth from a second bycaught D. delphis
(similar injury to tooth number 172 in Figure 5 but with the fractured section
in situe), presenting with the enamel chipped and a vertical fracture running
over halfway down the body of the tooth. The chipped enamel and underlying
dentin is rough and the fractured section is still in place, indicating that the
tooth has not been used since the injury was sustained, as the animal was most
probably dead.

Figure 7.
Tooth from a second bycaught D. delphis (Link
to Fort Bovisand) (similar injury to tooth number 172 in Figure 6),
presenting with the enamel chipped and a vertical fracture running over halfway
down the body of the tooth. The chipped enamel and underlying dentin is rough
and the fractured section is still in place, showing that the tooth has not been
used since the injury was sustained
|